A Rapid Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Copper in Real, Environmental, Biological and Soil Samples Using 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol

By M. Jamaluddin Ahmed¹, M. Saifuddin¹, Tasnima Jannat¹ and S. C. Bhattacharjee²
April 2010

  1. Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Chittagong, Chittagong - 4331, Bangladesh
  2. Bangladesh Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (BCSIR), Chittagong, Bangladesh

Corresponding Author: Prof. Dr. M. Jamaluddin Ahmed, pmjahmed55@gmail.com

Abstract
A simple and rapid spectrophotometric method is presented for the determination of copper at a trace level using 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN) as a new spectrophotometric reagent. The method is based on the reaction of non-absorbent PAN in slightly acidic (0.02-0.4 mol L-1 sulfuric acid) aqueous solution with Cu(II) to produce a highly absorbent red color chelate product that has an absorption maxima at 560 nm. The reaction is instantaneous and the absorbance remains stable for 72 h. The average molar absorption coefficient and Sandell’s sensitivity were found to 2.03 × 104 L mol-1 cm-1 and 9 ng mL-1 of Cu(II), respectively. The detection limit of the method is 4 µgL-1. Linear calibration graphs were obtained 0.01-7.0 mgL-1 of Cu(II); the stoichiometric composition of the chelate is 1:1 (Cu:PAN). A large excess of over 50 cations, anions and complexing agent (e. g. tartrate, oxalate, citrate, phosphate, SCN¯) do not interfere in the determination. The method was successfully used in the determination of Cu(II) in several Standard Reference Materials (brasses, alloys, and steels) as well as in some environmental waters (portable and polluted), biological samples (human blood and urine), soil samples and solution containing both Cu(I) and Cu(II). The method has high precision and accuracy.

Keywords: Spectrophotometry; 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-napthol; copper determination; Environmental; biological and soil samples.

Introduction

Copper is an essential trace nutrient to all high plants and animals. In animals, including human it is found in primarily in the bloodstream, and in copper-based pigments. However, insufficient amounts; copper can be poisonous and even fatal to organisms. Copper also has a significant presence as a decorative metal art. It can also be used as an anti-germ surface that can add to the anti-bacterial and antimicrobial feature of buildings such as hospitals [1]. Copper has a high electrical and thermal conductivity, second only to silver among pure metals at room temperature [2]. On the other hand, toxic rule of the metal ion is well recognized [3]. Increasing accumulation of copper(II) in the environment through numerous industrial sources, poses danger to public health. Hence; there is a great need to develop, simple, sensitive, selective and inexpensive methods for the determination of copper in environmental, biological, soil, and industrial samples for continuous monitoring to establish the levels of Cu(II) in environmental and biological matrices.


1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol

Spectrophotometry is essentially a trace-analysis technique and is one of the most powerful tools in chemical analysis. 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol has not previously been used for the spectrophotometric determination of copper. This paper reports on its use in a very sensitive, highly specific spectrophotometric method for the trace determination of copper. This method is far more selective, non-extractive, simple and rapid than all of the existing spectrophotometric methods [4-18]. The method is based on the reaction of non-absorbent PAN in a slightly acidic solution (0.02-0.4 mol L-1) with copper(II) to produce a highly absorbent red chelate product followed by a direct measurement of the absorbance in an aqueous solution with suitable masking, the reaction can be made highly selective and the reagent blank solution do not show any absorbance.

Experimental Section

Instrumentation

GBC (Australia) (Model:Cintral-6) double beam UV/VIS the recording spectrophotometer and Jenway (England, U.K) (Model - 30100) pH meter with a combination of electrodes were used for the measurements of absorbance and pH respectively. Chem. Tech. Anal. (U.K.) (Model-ALPHA 4) atomic absorption spectrophotometer equipped with a microcomputer controlled air-acetylene flame at 324.7nm was used for comparing the results. (Experimental conditions were: Slit width, 2 nm; lamp current, 3 mA; wavelength, 324.7; flow rate of carrier gases are- air, 6.5 L min.-1; acetylene, 2 L min.-1; sample volume, 10 µL.)

Reagent and solutions

All of the chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade or the highest purity available. Doubly distilled deionized water, which is non-absorbent under ultraviolet radiation, was used throughout. Glass vessels were cleaned by soaking in acidified solution of KMnO4 or K2Cr2O7 followed by washing with concentrated HNO3 and rinsed several times with deionized water. Stock solutions and environmental water samples (1000-mL each) were kept in polypropylene bottles containing 1-mL of concentrated HNO3. More rigorous contamination control was applied when the copper levels in the specimens were low.

Sample collection and preservation

Water: Water samples were collected in polythene bottles from shallow tube wells, tap-well, river, sea and drain of different places of Bangladesh. After collection, HNO3 (1 mL L-1)was added as preservative.

Blood and Urine: Blood and urine samples were collected in polypropylene bottles from effected persons of Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. Immediately after collection they were stored in a salt-ice mixture and latter, at the laboratory, were kept at-20°C.

Soil: Soil (surface) samples were collected from different locations in Bangladesh. Samples were dried in air and homogenized with a mortar.

PAN solution 4x10-3 mol L-1

This solution was prepared by dissolving the requisite amount of 1 - (2-Pyridrylazo)-2-naphthol (Aldrich A.C.S) is a known volume of distilled deionized water. More dilute solution of the reagent was prepared as required.

Copper(II) standard solution 1.57 × 10-2 mol L-1

A 100-mL amount of stock solution (1 mg mL-1) of Cu(II)was prepared by dissolving 392.9 mg of copper sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4. 5 H2O) in doubly distilled deionized water. Aliquots of this solution were standardized by iodometric titration. Working standard solution was prepared by suitable dilutions of the stock solution.

Copper(I) standard solution 1.57 × 10-2 mol L-1

A 100-mL amount of stock solution (1 mg mL-1) of Cu(I) was prepared by dissolving 155.7 mg of cuprous chloride (CuCl) in doubly distilled deionized water. Aliquots of this solution were standardized by iodometric titration. Working standard solution was prepared by suitable dilutions of stock solution.

Other solutions

Solutions of a large number of inorganic ions and complexing agents were prepared from their Analar grade or equivalent grade water salts (or the oxides and carbonates in hydrochloric acid), those of niobium, tantalum, titanium, zirconium and hafnium were specially prepared from their corresponding oxides (Specupure, Johnson Matthey) according to the recommended procedures [19]. In the case of insoluble substances, special dissolution methods were adopted [20].

Procedure

A volume of 0.1-1.0-mL of neutral aqueous solution containing 0.1-70 µg of copper (II) in a 10-mL volumetric flask was mixed with a 1:5 to 1:100 fold molar excess of 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-napthol (PAN) reagent solution (preferably 1-mL of 4 x 10-3 mol L-1) followed by the addition of 0.1 – 2.0-mL of 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid. The mixture was diluted to the mark with deionized water. After 1 min the absorbance was measured at 560 nm against a corresponding reagent blank. The copper content in an unknown sample was determined using a concurrently prepared calibration graph.

Result and Discussion

Fig 1 · A and B absorbance spectra of CuII-PAN system and
the reagent blank (λmax = 427 nm) in aqueous solutions
Fig 1

Factors Affecting the Absorbance

Absorption spectra
The absorption spectra of a copper (II)-PAN system in 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid medium was recorded using the spectrophotometer. The absorption spectra of the copper (II)-PAN is a asymmetric curve with maximum absorbance at 560 nm and an average molar absorption coefficient of 2.03 x 104 L mol-1 cm-1 (Fig 1).

The reagent did not show any absorbance. In all instances measurements were made at 560 nm against a reagent blank. The reaction mechanism of the present method is as reported earlier [21].

Fig 2 · Effect of solvent on the absorbance of CuII-PAN system
Fig 2

Effect of solvent

Because PAN is partially soluble in water, an organic solvent was used for the system of the various solvents (acetone, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, 1-butanol, isobutyl methyl ketone, methanol, ethanol and 1, 4-dioxane) studied, 1, 4-dioxane was found to be the best solvent for the system. Different volumes (0-7-mL) of 1, 4-dioxane was added to fixed metal ion concentration and the absorbance were measured according to the general procedure. It was observed that at 1 mg L-1 Cu(II)-chelate metal, 2-6-mL 1, 4-dioxane produced a constant absorbance of the Cu-chelate (Fig 2). For all subsequent measurements, 2-mL of 1, 4-dioxane was added.

Fig 3 · Effect of the acidity on the absorbance of CuII-PAN system
Fig 3

Effect of acidity

On the various acids (nitric, sulfuric, hydrochloric and phosphoric) studied, sulfuric acid was found to be the best acid for the system. The variation of the absorbance was noted after the addition of 0.05-5.0-mL of 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid to every 10-mL of test solution. The maximum and constant absorbance was obtained in the presence of 0.1-2-mL of 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid at room temperature (25±5)°C. Outside this range of acidity, the absorbance decreased (Fig 3). For all subsequent measurements 1-mL of 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid was added.

Fig 4 · Effect of the time on the absorbance of CuII-PAN system
Fig 4

Effect of time

The reaction is very fast. A constant maximum absorbance was obtained just after dilution to volume and remained strictly constant for over 72 h (Fig 4), a longer period of time was not studied.

Fig 5 · Effect of reagent (PAN:CuII molar concentration ratio)
on the absorbance of CuII-PAN system
Fig 5

Effect of reagent concentration

Different molar excesses of PAN were added to a fixed metal ion concentration and the absorbance was measured according to the general procedure. It was observed that a 1 mg L-1 of Cu metal, the reagent molar ratio of 1:5 to 1:100 produced a constant absorbance of Cu - chelate (Fig 5) for all subsequent measurements, 1-mL of 4 × 10-3 mol L-1 PAN reagent was added.

Fig 8 · Calibration graph C: 1-12 mg L-1 of cu(II)
Fig 8

Calibration graph (Beer’s law and sensitivity)

The well known equation for a spectrophotometric analysis in a very dilute solution was derived from Beer’s law. The effect of the metal concentration was studied over 0.01-100 mg L-1 distributed in four different sets (0.01 -0.1, 0.1-1.0, 1.0-10, 10-100 mg L-1) for convenience of the measurement. The absorbance was linear for 0.01-7.0 mg L-1 at 560 nm. Of the three calibration graphs one showing the limit of the linearity is given in Fig 8.

The next two are straight-line graphs passing through the origin (Fig 6 & 7).

Fig 7 · Calibration graph B: 0.1-1.0 mg L-1 of cu(II)
Fig 7
Fig 6 · Calibration graph A: 0.01-0.1 mg L-1 of cu(II)
Fig 6

The molar absorption co-efficient and the Sandell’s sensitivity [22] were found to be 2.03 x 104 L mol-1 cm-1 and 9 ng mL-1 of Cu(II). The results of optimization are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 · Selected analytical parameters obtained with optimization experiments
Parameters Studied range Selective value
Wave length / λmax(nm) 200 - 800 560
Solvent / mL 0 - 7 2 - 6
(preferably 2)
Acidity H2SO4 / mol L-1 0.01 - 1.0 0.02 - 0.4
(preferably 0.2 )
Time / h 0 - 72 1 min - 72 h
(preferably 5 min)
Temerature / °C 25 ± 5 25 ± 5
Reagent (fold molar excess, M:R) 1:1 - 1:200 1:5 - 1:100
Molar absorption
Coefficient / L mol-1 cm-1
1.02 × 104 - 3.05 × 104 2.03 × 104
Linear range / mg L-1 0.001 - 100 0.01 - 7.0
Detection limit / µg L-1 1 - 10 4.0
Reproducibility (%RSD) 0.00 - 5 0.00 - 1.33

Precision and accuracy

The precision of the present method was evaluated by determining different concentration of Cu (each analyzed at least five times). The relative standard deviation (n=5) was 0-2% for 0.1-70 µg of copper in 10-mL indicating that this method is highly precise and reproducible. The detection limit (3s of the blank) and Sandell’s sensitivity (concentration for 0.001 absorbance unit) for copper(II) were found to be 4 ng mL-1 and 9 ng mL-1, respectively. The results for total copper(II) were in good agreement with the certified values (Table 4).

The reliability of our Cu-chelate procedure was tested by recovery studies. The average percentage recovery obtained for the addition of a copper(II) spike to some environmental water samples was quantitative, as shown in Table 5.

The method was also tested by analyzing several synthetic mixtures containing copper(II) and diverse ions (Table 3).

The result of biological samples analyses by the spectrophotometric method were in excellent agreement with those obtained by AAS Table 6.

The results of speciation of Cu(I) and Cu(II) in mixture were highly reproducible Table 8. Hence, the precision and accuracy of the method were found to be excellent.

Effect of foreign ions

The effect of over 40 ions and complexing agents on the determination of only 1 mg L-1 of Cu(II) was studied. The criterion for interference [23] was an absorbance value varying by more than 5% from the expected value for Cu(II) alone. As can be seen, a large number of ions have no significant effect on the determination of copper. The some interference was from Co(II), V(V), Fe(II), Fe(III), Ni(II) ions. Interferences from these ions are preferably due to complex formation with PAN. The greater tolerance limits for these ions can be achieved by using several masking methods. In order to eliminate the interference of V(V), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II) ions tartrate, citrate, dimethylglyoxime, 1, 10- phenanthroline can be used as masking agents. A 10-fold excess of Ni(II) could be masked with dimethylglyoxime and 10-fold Fe(II) could be masked with 1,10 phenanthroline, Pb2+ could be masked with SO42-and Mo(VI) could be masked with tartrate.

As stated above the proper masking agents may be added by while aiming at different interfering ions according to the actual composition of the sample. For this reason, the reliability of the proposed method is greatly improved and the practically is increased particularly the copper amounts in complex sample may be determined by using the proposed method. Moreover, the tolerance limit of NO3¯, SO42-, and PO43- are especially high which is advantageous with respect to the digestion of samples. During interference studies, if a precipitate was formed, it was removed by centrifugation. The quantities of these diverse ions mentioned were the actual amounts added and not the tolerance limits. However, for those ions whose tolerance limits have been studied, their tolerance ratios are mentioned in Table 2.

Table 2 · Tolerance limits of foreign ions*, tolerance ratio [Species(x)]/Cu (w/w)
Species x Tolerance ratio x/Cu (w/w) Species x Tolerance ratio x/Cu (w/w)
Tartrate 1000 As3+, Al3+, 100
Nitrate 1000 Sn2+, Se(VI) 100
Chloride 1000 Mn2+,Hg2+, 100
Fluoride 1000 Ce3+ 100
Bromide 1000 Cs3+ 100
Acetate 500 Ba2+ 10
Thiocyanide 500 Pb2+ 10a
Citrate 500 Ni2+ 10b
Phosphate 500 Mo(VI) 10c
Iodide 1000 Fe2+ 10d
Ascorbic acid 100 Zn2+ 100
SO42-, ClO4¯ 1000 Sr2+ 100
Oxalate 100 CN¯ 100
Azide 100 Cd2+ 100
NH4+, Na+, K+ 100 Cr3+ 70
Ca2+, Mg2+ 100 Ag+ 100
*Tolerance limit defined as ratio that causes less than 5 percent interference.
awith 10 mg L-1, sulfate.
bwith 50 mg L-1 DMG
cwith 100 mg L-1 tartrate.
dwith 50 mg L-1 1, 10-phenanthroline

Composition of the absorbent complex

Job’s method [24] of continuous variation and the molar-ratio method were applied to ascertain the stoichiometric composition of the complex. A Cu:PAN (1:1) complex indicated by the method

Applications

The present method was successfully applied to the determination of copper(II) in series of synthetic mixtures of various compositions (Table 3) and also in number of real samples, e.g. several standards alloys and steels (Table 4). The method was also extended to the determination of copper in a number of environmental water samples, biological and soil samples. In view of the unknown composition of environmental water samples. The same equivalent portions of each sample was analyzed for copper content, recoveries in both ‘spiked’ was (added to the samples before the mineralization and dissolution) and the ‘unspiked’ conditions are in good agreement (Table 5). The results of biological analyses by spectrophotometric method were found to be in excellent agreement with those obtained by AAS (Table 6). The results of soil samples analysis by the spectrophotometric method are shown in Table 7. The speciation of Cu(I) and Cu(II) in mixtures are in Table 8.

Determination of copper in some synthetic mixtures

Several synthetic mixtures of varying compositions containing copper(II) and diverse ions of known concentrations were determined by the present method. The results were found to be highly reproducible. The results are given in Table 3.

Table 3 · Determination of Cu(II) in some synthetic mixtures
Sample Composition of mixture/mg L-1 Copper (II) mg L-1 Recovery ± sb%
Added Found
A Cu(II) 0.5 0.485 97 ± 0.6
1.0 1.0 100 ± 0.0
B As in A+Al3+(25)+Zn2+ (25) 0.5 0.49 98 ± 0.7
1.0 0.985 97 ± 0.5
C As in B+Ca2+(25)+Mg2+(25) 0.5 0.50 100 ± 0.0
1.0 1.03 103 ± 0.8
D As in C+As3+(25)+Mn2+(25) 0.5 0.52 104 ± 0.7
1.0 1.04 104 ± 0.6
E As in D+Cd2+(25)+Hg2+(25) 0.5 0.53 106 ± 0.8
1.0 1.07 107 ± 0.9
F As in E +Se6+(25)+ Sn2+(25) 0.5 0.54 108 ± 1.0
1.0 1.09 109 ± 1.5
aAverage of five analysis of each sample
bThe measure of precision is the standard deviation (s).

Determination of copper in some alloys, steels and brass (Certified Reference Materials)

A 0.1g amount of an alloy or steel or brass sample containing 60.8 - 70.61% of copper was accurately weighed and placed in a 50-mL Erlenmeyer flask. To it, 10-mL of concentrated HNO3 and 1-mL of concentrated H2SO4 were carefully added and then covered with a watch-glass until the brisk reaction subsides. The solution was heated and simmered gently after the addition of another 5-mL of concentrated HNO3 until all carbides were decomposed. The solution was carefully evaporated to dense white fumes to drive off the oxides of nitrogen and then cooled to room temperature (25±5)°C. After suitable dilution with deionized water, the contents of the Erlenmeyer flask were warmed to dissolve the soluble salts. The solution was then cooled and neutralized with a dilute NH4OH solution in the presence of 1-2-mL of 0.01% (w/v) tartrate solution. The resulting solution filtered, if necessary, through Whatman no. 40 filter paper into a 25-mL calibrated flask. The residue (silica and tungstic acid) was washed with a small volume ( 5-mL) of hot (1:99) sulfuric acid, followed by water, the filtration and washing were collected in the same calibrated flask and the volume was made up to the mark with deionized water.

A suitable aliquot (1-2-mL) of the above solution was taken into a 10-mL calibrated flask and the copper content was determined as described under procedure using citrate or fluoride as masking agent. The results are given in Table 4. The certified copper value in alloys, steels and brass were obtained.

Table 4 · Analysis of some high-speed steels, alloys and brass
Sample Certified Reference
Material (Composition, %)
Copper (%) Recovery ± sb
Certified value Founda
1 Bureau of Analysed Samples Ltd. No., BAS-CRM 10g (high tensile) Sn, 0.21. Zn, 30. Al, 3.34. Pb, 0.023. Ni, 0.06. Fe, 1.56. Mn, 1.36. Cu, 60.8. 60.8 60.4 99 ± 0.6
2 Bureau of Analysed Samples Ltd. No., BAS-CRM-5g Cu, 67.4. Sn, 1.09. Pb, 2.23. Zn, 28.6, Ni, 0.33. P, 0.01. 67.4 67.60 100.3 ±1.5
3 Brass, Class 1, Pb, 0.00. Fe, 0.01. Cu, 70.61. 70.61 70.55 99.9 ± 1.0
aAverage of the five replicate determinations
bThe measure of precision is the standard deviation (s).

Determination of copper in some environmental water samples

Each filtered (with Whatman No. 40) environmental water sample (1000-mL) was evaporated nearly to dryness with a mixture of 2-mL of concentrated H2SO4 and 5-mL of concentrated HNO3 to sulfur trioxide fumes. After cooling additions of 5-mL of concentrated HNO3 was repeated and heating to a dense fume continued or until the solution became colorless. The solution was then cooled and neutralized with dilute NH4OH in the presence of 1-2-mL of a 0.01% (w/v) tartrate solution. The resulting solution was then filtered and quantitatively transferred into a 25-mL calibrated flask and made up to the mark with deionized water.

An aliquot (1-2-mL) of this preconcentrated water sample was pipetted into a 10-mL calibrated flask and the copper content was determined as described under the procedure using citrate or fluoride as a masking agent. The results of analyses of environmental water samples from various sources for copper are given in Table 5.

Most spectrophotometric methods for the determination of copper in natural, and sea water require the preconcentration of copper [25]. The concentration of copper in natural and sea water is a few µg L-1 in developed countries. The mean concentration of copper in natural found in U.S. drinking water is greater than 20 µg L-1 [26].

Determination of copper in some biological samples

Regarding human blood (3-mL) and urine (20-mL), transferred into a 25-mL beaker. The sample was then ashed in a Muffle furnace at 500°C for a 4 h in the presence of 1-mL concentrated nitric acid following a method recommended by Stahr [27]. Then at the following content of each beaker were cooled at room temperature, 1.5-mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid to each beaker and warmed slightly. The content of each beaker was filtered and neutralized with dilute ammonia in the presence of 1-2-mL of 0.01% (w/v) tartrate solution, transferred quantitatively into a 10-mL calibrated flask and made up to the mark with deionized water.

A suitable aliquot (1-2-mL) of the final solution was pipetted into a 10-mL calibrated flask and the copper content was determined as described under the procedure using a fluoride or thiocyanate solution as masking agent. The results of the biological analyses by the spectrophotometric method were found to be in excellent agreement with those obtained by AAS. The results are in given in Table 5.

Table 5 · Determination of copper in some environmental water samples
Sample Copper / µg L-1 Recovery ± s (%) sr (%)b
Added Founda
Tap water 0 33.0
100 135.0 101.5 ± 0.3 0.21
500 538.0 100.9 ±. 0.5 0.25
Well water 0 41.0
100 140.0 99 ± 0.6 0.32
500 545.0 100.7 ± 0.7 0.35
River water Karnafuly
(upper)
0 54.0
100 155.0 100.6 ± 0.5 0.19
500 560.0 101.0 ± 0.8 0.29
Karnafuly
(lower)
0 58.0
100 160.0 101.3 ± 0.6 0.39
500 562.0 100.7 ± 0.4 0.24
Sea water Bay of
Bengal
(upper)
0 35.0
100 138.0 102.0 ± 0.8 0.45
500 540.0 100.9 ± 0.5 0.35
Bay of
Bengal
(lower)
0 40.0
100 145.0 103.0 ± 0.6 0.39
500 548.0 101.4 ± 0.7 0.41
Lake water Kaptai 0 75.0
100 170.0 97.0 ± 0.5 0.35
500 580.0 100.8 ± 0.8 0.45
Drain water Fertilizer
Factoryc
0 125.0
100 230.0 102.0 ± 0.8 0.49
500 635.0 101.6 ± 0.9 0.56
KPMd 0 85.0
100 180.0 97.3 ± 0.6 0.29
500 590.0 100.8 ± 0.8 0.38
aAverage of five replicate determinations.
bThe measure precision is the relative standard deviation (sr)
cPolash Fertilizer Factory, Norshingdi, Dhaka.
dKarnafuly Paper Mill, Chandraghona, Chittagong.

A deficiency of copper causes diseases such as anemia while excess of it causes “Jaundice and Wilson’s disease” [28]. An excess of copper can contribute to many symptoms: depression, spaciness, paranoia, alternating moods, anxiety, panic, fearfulness, schizophrenia, phobias, etc [29].

Table 6 · Concentration of copper in some blood and urine samples
Serial
No
Sample Copper / µg L-1 Sample sourcea
AAS Proposed methodb
1 Blood 525.0 528.0 ± 1.3 Wilson’s diseases patient (male)
Urine 145.0 152 ± 1.5
2 Blood 128.0 132.0 ± 1.6 Normal adult (male)
Urine 36.8 40.5 ± 1.8
aSamples were from Chittagong Medical College Hospital.
bAverage of five replicate determinations ± s

Determination of copper in some soil samples

An air-dried homogenized soil sample (100g) was accurately weighed and placed in a 100-mL micro-Kjeldahl flask. The sample was digested in the presence of an oxidizing agent following a method recommended by Jackson [30]. The content of flask was filtrated through Whatman No. 40 filter paper into a 25-mL calibrated flask, and neutralized with dilute ammonia in the presence of 1-2-mL of a 0.01% (w/v) tartrate solution. It was then diluted up to the mark with deionized water. A suitable aliquots (1-2-mL) were transferred into a 10-mL calibrated flask and the copper content was determined as described under procedure using fluoride or thiocyanide solution as a masking agent. The results are given in Table 7.

Table 7 · Determination of copper in some surface soil samples
Serial
No
Copper (µg g-1)a Sample source
S1c 30.5 ± 1.5b Agriculture soil (Chittagong University Campus)
S2 45.8 ± 1.8 Esturine soil (Karnafuly river)
S3 18.5 ± 1.3 Marine soil (Chittagong Sea Beach)
S4 125.0 ± 1.8 Industrial soil (Fertilizer Fcatory, Norsingdi)
S5 70.5 ± 1.7 Roadside soil (Chittagong – Rangamati road)
aAverage of five analysis of each sample
bThe measure of precision is the standard deviation (s).
cComposition of soil samples: C, N, P, K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Pb, Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo, Co, NO3, NO2, SO4, etc.

Determination of cu(I) and cu(II) speciation in mixture

Suitable aliquots (1-2-mL) of copper (I+II) mixtures (preferably 1:1 and 1:3) were taken in 25-mL conical flasks. A few drops of 1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid and 1-3-mL of 1% (w/v) potassium permanganate solution were added to oxidize the monovalent copper, 5-mL of water was added to the mixtures and heated on a steam bath for 10-15 min. with occasional gentle shaking and the cooled to room temperature. Then, 3-4 drops of freshly prepared sodium azide solution (2.5% w/v) were added and gently heated with a further addition of 2-3-mL of water if necessary for 5 min. to drive off the azide, cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was neutralized with dilute ammonia and transferred quantitatively into a 10-mL volumetric flask; 1-mL of 4 × 10-3 mol L-1 PAN reagent solution was then added, followed by the addition of 1-mL of 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid was made unto the mark with deionized water. The absorbance was measured after 1 min. at 560 nm against reagent blank. The total copper content was calculated with the help of a calibration graph.

An equal aliquot of the above mentioned copper (I+II) mixture was taken into a 25- mL beaker. A 1-mL volume of 0.05 % (w/v) thiocyanide (SCN-) was added to mask copper(I) and was neutralized with dilute NH4OH. The content of the beaker was transferred into a 10-mL volumetric flask. Then, 1-mL of a 0.2 mol L-1 sulfuric acid solution was added followed by the addition of 1-mL of 4 × 10-3 mol L-1 PAN and made up to the volume with deionized water. After 1 min. the absorbance was measured against a reagent blank as before. The copper concentration was calculated in mg L-1 or µg mL-1 with the aid of a calibration graph. This gave a measure of the copper(II) originally present in the mixture. This value was subtracted from that of the total copper to obtain the copper(I) present in the mixture. The results were found to be highly reproducible. The occurrences of such reproducible results are also reported for different oxidation states of copper [31]. The results of a set of determination are given in Table 8.

Table 8 · Determination of copper (I) and copper (II) speciation in mixtures
Serial
No
Cu(II): Cu(I) Cu taken/mg L-1 Cu found/mg L-1 Error/mg L-1
Cu(II) Cu(I) Cu(II) Cu(I) Cu(II) Cu(I)
1 1:1 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.02 0.01
2 1:1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.00 0.02
3 1:1 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.01 0.01
Mean error: Cu(II) = ± 0.01 Cu(I) = ± 0.013
Standard deviation: Cu(II) = ± 0.01 Cu(I) = ± 0.011
1 1:3 1.00 3.00 0.99 2.98 0.01 0.02
2 1:3 1.00 3.00 0.98 2.98 0.02 0.02
3 1:3 1.00 3.00 0.99 2.99 0.01 0.01
Mean error: Cu(II) = ± 0.013 Cu(I) = ± 0.016
Standard deviation: Cu(II) = ± 0.0058 Cu(I) = ± 0.006

Conclusions

The proposed method possesses distinct advantages over the existing methods [4-18] and recently published spectrophotometric methods concerning copper [10]. First the determination of copper with the proposed color system can be directly conducted in an aqueous solution without the need for any separations or clean up step. Second, the reaction is instantaneous and the absorbance remains stable for over 72 h. Third, the useful concentration range (0.01-7.0 µg mL-1) for Beer’s low is widened. Fourth, with suitable masking, the reaction can be made highly selective and reagent blank solutions do not show any absorbance. Finally, the results obtained in this work show that the proposed method is applicable to a variety of copper containing samples, and that the method is simple, selective and accurate. Therefore this method will be successfully applied to the monitoring of small amounts of copper in industrial, environmental, biological and soil samples.

References

  1. Feder, B. J. 2008. Regulators Stamp Copper as a Germ Killer. New York Times, March 26
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory-Copper. http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper.
  3. Saker B., Haussac J. P. and Hau S.1983. Transport forms of copper in human serum, In D. Saker (ED); Biological Aspects of Metal and Metal-Related Disease, Revan Press, New York, p.159
  4. Gholivand, M. B., Mozaffari, Y., Sobhani, S. and Ghasemi, J. 2008. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of cobalt, nickel, and copper using the partial least-squares method after the preconcentration of their 2-aminocyclopentene-1-dithiocarboxylate complexes on microcrystalline naphthalene, Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 63:232-38.
  5. Sunitha B. Mathew, Ajai K. Pillai, 2007. Micro wave assisted spectrophotometric method for the determination of copper using leucocrystal violet, Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop., 21(1): 129-134.
  6. Shpigun, L., Shushenachev, Ya. and Kamilova, P. 2007. Spectrophotometric determination of coppr (II) and zinc (II) based on their kinetic separation in flow-injection systems. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 62 (7): 623-31
  7. Fu, D. and Yuan, D. 2006. Spectrophotometric determination of trace copper in water samples with thiomichlersketone, Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc, (July 19)
  8. Ghazy, S. E., El-Shazly R. M., El-Shahawi, M. S., Al-Hazmi, G. A. A. and El-Asmy, A. A. 2006. Spectrophotometric Determination of Copper (II) in Natural Waters, Vitamins and Certified Steel Scrap Samples Using Acetophenone-p-chlorophenylthiosemicarbazone, Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 3(2):140-50.
  9. Massoud and Nejati- Yazdnejad. 2006. Spectrophotometric determination of trace Cu (II) ion based on complexation with Anthraquinine derivative, Anal Sci., 22: 617-19.
  10. Shishehbore, M. R., Nasirizadeh, N., Haji Shabni, A. M., Tabatabaee, M. 2005. Spectrophotometric determination of trace copper after Precocentration with 1,5-Diphenylcarbazone on Microcrystalline 11. Naphthalene, Canadian Journal of Analytical Science and Spectroscopy, 50: 130-34.
  11. Subramanyam S., Kumar, J. R., Reddy, K.J., and Reddy, A. V. 2005. Development of an Extractive Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Copper(II) in Leafy Vegetable and Pharmaceutical Samples Using Pyridoxal-4-phenyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (PPT), J. Agric. Food Chem., 53 (14): 5492-98.
  12. Sandra, V. M., Jorge, L., Caroline, D., Lucas, C., Marina, T., Marcia, R Edílson., V. and Eder, C 2005. Use of 1,3-diaminepropane-3-propyl grafted onto a silica gel as a sorbent for flow-injection spectrophotometric determination of copper (II) in digests of biological materials and natural waters, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 62(1-3):398-406
  13. Bin Du - Bin Du, Liu, Yan., Ding, Yulong., Duan, Caihong., and Qin Wei - Qin Wei. 2005. Catalytic Kinetic Spectrophotometric Determination of Trace Amounts of Copper (II) in Biosamples using Tween-20 Microemulsion as Sensitizer. Analytical Letters, 38(4):711 - 725
  14. Asan, A. and Isildak, I., 2003. A simple and selective flow-injection spectrophotometric determination of copper (II) by using acetylsalicylhydroxamic acid, Talanta, 60:861-66.
  15. Ohno, S., Teshima, N., Zhang, H., and Sakai, T. 2003. Utilization of activating and masking effects by ligands for highly selective catalytic spectrophotometric determination of copper and iron in natural waters, Tanata, 60:1177-85.
  16. Thipyapong, K, and Suksai, C. 2003. Spectrophotometric Determination of Copper (II) Using Diamine-Dioxime Derivative, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 24(12):1767-70.
  17. Cesur, H. and Bati, B. 2002. Solid-Phase Extraction of copper with lead 4- benzylpiperidithiocabamate on Microcrystalline Naphthlene and its spectrophotometric determination, Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 26:599-606
  18. Pourreza, N. and Behpour, M. 1998. Catalytic Spectrophotometric Determination of Trace Amounts of Copper (II) Based on the Oxidation of 2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazone-1, 2-naphtoquinone-4-sulfonic Acid by Hydrogen Peroxide, Anal. Sci., 14(5):997
  19. Mukharjee, A. K. 1970. Analytical chemistry of Zirconium and Hafnium, 1st ed., Pergamon Press, New York, 12
  20. Pal B. K. and Chowdhury B.1984.Triazene-N-oxiodes as new type of flurometric reagents. Part I: trace determination of Zirconium at the nanogram level. Mikrochim. Acta., 83:121-31.
  21. Busev A. I. and Ivanov V. M.1981. Analytical Chemistry of Rare Elements, Mir Publisher’s Moscow, 385.
  22. Sandell, E. B. Colorimetric determination of trace of metals, 3rd ed., 1965, Interscience, New York, 269.
  23. Ojeda, C. B, Torres, A. G., Rojas, F.S. and Pavon, JMC. 1987. Flurometric determination of trace amounts of gallium in biological tissues.Analyst, 112: 1499-501.
  24. Yoe, J.A. and Jones, A.L., 1944. Stability constant of coordination compounds, Ind. Eng. Anal. Ed., 16:11
  25. Welz, B., Yin X. F., and Sperling, M. 1992. Time-based and volume-based sampling for flow-injection on-line sorbent extraction graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry Analytical Chimica Acta., 261: 477.
  26. Greenberg, E. A., Clesceri, S. L. and Eaton, D. A. (eds), 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edn., Americation Public Health Association, Washington D.C,13.
  27. Stahr, H. M. 1991. Analytical methods in Toxicology. thired ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 57.
  28. Rekhai, D. Suvardhani, K Kumar, K.S. Reddyprasad, P. Jayaraj B. and Chiranjeevi, P. 2007. Extractive spectrophotometric determination of copper (II) in water and alloy samples with 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde-4-bromophenyl hydrazone (3, 4-MHBBPH), J. Serb. Chem. Soc, 72(3):3299-310.
  29. Paul, Eck C. and Wilson, L. Introduction to copper toxicity, AdvancedFamilyHealth.com
  30. Jacson, M.L.1965. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 346
  31. Ferrer-Herranz J. L. and Perez-Dendito D. 1981. Anal. Chem. Acta. 132: 157.

***

Copyright © 2010, ECO Services International